Search This Blog

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

(Unknown)

The biggest TV manufacturers are finally starting to reveal prices for their new 3D TV sets, and believe it or not, several of the new sets will actually cost about the same or even a bit less than last year's equivalent 2D models. That said, there's a catch: The active-shutter LCD glasses that you'll need to watch 3D video cost a pretty penny.
Samsung was the first of the big four TV makers to flip its 3D pricing cards over this week; Panasonic is up tomorrow, while Sony and LG will follow in the coming weeks and months.

Samsung's new LED-backlit LCD 3D sets (which start shipping this month) run the gamut from 40 to 55 inches, and they're set to arrive in three separate lines: the "affordable" (well, relatively speaking) LED C7000 series (240Hz refresh rate, Internet widgets, and Ethernet), the mid-range C8000 series (which adds local LED dimming), and the top-of-the-line C9000 line (which comes with its own, snazzy touchscreen remote control).

So, how much are we talking here? Well, expect to spend a whopping $6,999 for the biggest, 55-inch LED C9000, all the way down to $1,999 for the smallest "bargain" set, the 40-inch C7000. (You can check out Samsung's full 3D TV pricing sheet right here.)

Now, as CNET's David Katzmaier points out, those prices are (in general) a few hundred bucks more than the current pricing of last year's equivalent models. For example, Samsung's 2009 46-inch B7000 LCD HDTV is selling on Amazon for about $2,350, or about $250 more than the new, $2,599 46-inch 3D-capable C7000, according to Katzmaier.

That said, keep in mind that the original list price for the 2009 46-inch B7000 was actually $2,999, or about $400 more than this year's new 3D-ready version. And indeed, Amazon has already discounted the new 46-inch C7000 to just $2,339, a tiny bit cheaper than last year's equivalent model.

Of course, we'll have to wait and see how the other big TV manufactures decide to price their 3D TV sets, but if they follow the trend, it may well turn out that you won't be paying much of a premium—if any—for this year's crop of 3D-capable HDTVs, especially once retailers start cutting prices.
BUT ... yep, there's a "but" here ... you will pay a premium for the battery-powered, active-shutter 3D glasses that are required to watch 3D video on Samsung's new sets.

Unlike the disposable 3D glasses you get at most movie theaters, the active-shutter glasses necessary for most 3D TVs work by rapidly opening and closing LCD "shutters" in the left and right lenses, thus ensuring that your left and right eyes are seeing the correct left or right image at precisely the right time. The glasses must also sync themselves with your TV via an infrared sensor.

As I've been warning for months now, these active-shutter 3D glasses won't come cheap, and indeed ... as CNET reports, Samsung will be charging $150 a pair for them. In other words, if you've got a family of four who wants to watch "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" on your new Samsung 3D TV, well ... that'll be $600, please. (And I wouldn't count on Samsung's competitors charging much less.)

Monday, March 8, 2010

Check out this!!

Sorry, I forgot to tell you that I made a blog/website about Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics. Although Vancouver 2010 is over, you can check out the website. It is olympics2010winter.blogspot.com.

(NO subject)!!!!

Do you love Hardy Boys, Nancy Drew, Harry Potter, Magic Tree House, Capitol Mysteries, Calendar Mysteries, A-Z Mysteries, or any other books?
If you want to send comments about them, just send a comment for me below. You will have to give email, gender, what book you like, the author of the book and your first name. I will try my best to deliver them to the authors. I will email you if that is possible. Maybe if you get a letter back from the author, I will send it to your email address so give a correct email address!!!




(No subject)!!

Great earthquakes occur once a year, on average. The largest recorded earthquake was the Great Chilean Earthquake of May 22, 1960 which had a magnitude (MW) of 9.5.[6]

The following table lists the approximate energy equivalents in terms of TNT explosive force[7] - though note that the energy here is that of theunderground energy release (i.e. a small atomic bomb blast will not simply cause light shaking of indoor items) rather than the overground energy release. Most energy from an earthquake is not transmitted to and through the surface; instead, it dissipates into the crust and other subsurface structures.

Richter
Approximate Magnitude
Approximate TNT for
Seismic Energy Yield
Joule equivalentExample
0.01 kg (2.2 lb)4.2 MJ
0.55.6 kg (12.4 lb)23.5 MJLarge hand grenade
1.032 kg (70 lb)132.3 MJConstruction site blast
1.5178 kg (392 lb)744.0 MJWWII conventional bombs
2.01 metric ton4.18 GJLate WWII conventional bombs
2.55.6 metric tons23.5 GJWWII blockbuster bomb
3.031.6 metric tons132.3 GJMassive Ordnance Air Blast bomb
3.5178 metric tons747.6 GJChernobyl nuclear disaster, 1986
4.01 kiloton4.18 TJSmall atomic bomb
4.55.6 kilotons23.5 TJ
5.031.6 kilotons134.4 TJNagasaki atomic bomb (actual seismic yield was negligible since it detonated in the atmosphere)
Lincolnshire earthquake (UK), 2008
5.5178 kilotons747.6 TJLittle Skull Mtn. earthquake (NV, USA), 1992
Alum Rock earthquake (CA, USA), 2007
2008 Chino Hills earthquake (Los Angeles, USA)
6.01 megaton4.18 PJDouble Spring Flat earthquake (NV, USA), 1994
6.55.6 megatons23.5 PJCaracas (Venezuela), 1967
Rhodes (Greece), 2008
Eureka Earthquake (Humboldt County CA, USA), 2010
6.711.2 megatons46.9 PJNorthridge earthquake (CA, USA), 1994
6.922.4 megatons93.7 PJSan Francisco Bay Area earthquake (CA, USA), 1989
7.031.6 megatons132.3 PJJava earthquake (Indonesia), 2009
2010 Haiti Earthquake
7.144.7 megatons186.9 PJEnergy released is equivalent to that of Tsar Bomba (50 megatons, 210 PJ), the largest thermonuclear weapon ever tested
1944 San Juan earthquake
7.5178 megatons744.0 PJKashmir earthquake (Pakistan), 2005
Antofagasta earthquake (Chile), 2007
7.8501 megatons2.10 EJTangshan earthquake (China), 1976
Hawke's Bay earthquake (New Zealand), 1931)
8.01 gigaton4.18 EJSan Francisco earthquake (CA, USA), 1906
Queen Charlotte earthquake (BC, Canada), 1949
México City earthquake (Mexico), 1985
Gujarat earthquake (India), 2001
Chincha Alta earthquake (Peru), 2007
Sichuan earthquake (China), 2008
1894 San Juan earthquake
8.55.6 gigatons23.5 EJToba eruption[citation needed] 75,000 years ago; the largest known volcanic event
Sumatra earthquake (Indonesia), 2007
8.815.8 gigatons66.3 EJChile earthquake, 2010
9.031.6 gigatons132.3 EJLisbon Earthquake (Lisbon, Portugal), All Saints Day, 1755
9.263.1 gigatons264.0 EJAnchorage earthquake (AK, USA), 1964
9.389.1 gigatons372.9 EJIndian Ocean earthquake, 2004
9.5178 gigatons744.0 EJValdivia earthquake (Chile), 1960
10.01 teraton4.18 ZJNever recorded by humans
13.0108 megatons372.9 ZJYucatán Peninsula impact (causing Chicxulub crater) 65 Ma ago (108 megatons = 100 teratons; almost 5x1030 ergs = 500 ZJ).[8][9][10][11][12]